Friday, November 30, 2007

Third International Conference on Colombia in Bogota

The third gathering of the International Conference on Colombia is taking place today in Bogota. This conference, established in 2003 at the suggestion of the United Kingdom, aims to create a space for open dialogue between the Colombian government and civil society. This year's conference brings together fifty seven international delegates from 34 countries to discuss humanitarian issues, including poverty, illegal drugs, and the international humanitarian crisis taking place in Colombia.

In anticipation of this conference, earlier in the week I received a report from Refugees International that outlines three key measures recommended to improve conditions of Colombia's internally displaced people. Refugees International will present these recommendations to delegates during the conference.

According to the United Nations, displacement in Colombia remains the largest humanitarian crisis in the Western Hemisphere. For over four decades, millions of Colombians have been forcibly displaced because of violence and conflict. While all of Colombian society is affected, displacement is mainly hitting campesino, indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities living in rural areas. Cities are often the final destination of the displaced, who search for safety through anonymity. Upon arrival the displaced face the grim prospect of being unemployed and becoming dependents on outside assistance. Their future is often one of destitution.

In its December 2007 report, "Striving for Better Days: Improving the Lives of Internally Displaced People in Colombia", Refugees International urges the Government of Colombia to take three concrete steps to address the humanitarian crisis of internal displacement in the country. One of these three steps is a call for the Government of Colombia, "to create durable and sustainable livelihoods for displaced communites". This recommendation especially resonates with me since it ties in with my research of how international organizations can most effectively serve and assist Colombia's internal refugees.

Another interesting point that caught my attention in the report is a comment by Refugees International that, "some of the current handout and welfare-based programs carried out by the [Colombian] government are not financially sustainable, and risk quashing the self-initiative of the displaced."

I know from my research on social enterprises, that financial sustainability and self-empowerment are critical for a project's success. Delancey Street Foundation in San Francisco, one of the most successful residential drug rehabilitation programs in the United States, provides a strong example: its success is a result of financial sustainability derived from its seven for-profit businesses, as well as a "staff" made up entirely by the residents it exists to help.

In its report, Refugees International suggests that
"The government of Colombia should redesign programs to invest in income generating activities and vocational training courses to provide skills required by the urban labor market. And, [international] donors must evaluate current interventions in skill training and income generation to offer sustainable livelihoods for displaced households."
When you teach someone to fish, rather than giving a hand-out, you empower them and give them back their dignity. With the millions of displaced people in Colombia, the only sustainable way to improve conditions and to alleviate dependence on outside assistance in the long run is to teach the displaced how to fish.

A vocational training/business model like Delancey Street, combined with access to technology, would greatly benefit internally displaced people in Colombia and provide them with the tools and knowledge needed to play a more active role in an urban, globalized economy.

Aside from this, it seems evident that the only other way to assist displaced people in Colombia is to focus also on the root cause of why they are being displaced in the first place. But I'll save - that - topic for another post.

Today's international conference in Bogota is a positive step, since it keeps Colombia's often overlooked humanitarian crisis of internal refugees on the world's stage.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

MicroPlace: is this Ebay's version of Kiva?


There always seems to be a buzz about some cool new venture taking off in San Francisco, and tonight the excitement took place at The City Club downtown, with a party that centered on the official launch of MicroPlace, a new Ebay subsidiary that provides a way for everyday people to make investments in the world's working poor.

Like many people, when I first heard of MicroPlace a couple of months ago, I thought it sounded just like Kiva, a non-profit also in San Francisco that supports microfinance institutions in developing countries through its peer-to-peer online lending model. I was curious to find out what was different about MicroPlace, and in my search for an answer I came upon two great blog posts, one by Robert Katz and one by Josh Susser.

Susser, who worked on MicroPlace's engineering team, calls to attention the following important points about MicroPlace:
  1. MicroPlace is a SEC-registered online brokerage, and pays a return on your investment. It's a small return, a few percent, but it'll beat the rate in a typical savings account.
  2. When you fund your investment through PayPal, PayPal waives the transaction fee, so 100% of your money goes into the loan.
  3. When you invest, you do not fund a person directly. Instead, you choose a country, and a specific fund in that country. The fund you choose will make loans to individuals. The MicroPlace model is similar to investing in a mutual fund of microloans. You purchase investments from microfinance security issuers.
  4. Any profits made by MicroPlace will be donated to non-profits, including the eBay Foundation.
Great. So then what exactly is the Kiva model?
  1. Kiva is a non-profit, and as such does not provide lenders with an interest return on the loan they make.
  2. Similar to MicroPlace, Kiva.org also receives free payment processing from PayPal, which helps Kiva to keep operational expenses low.
  3. In the Kiva model, you lend to a specific entrepreneur in a developing country and can receive email journal updates from this entrepreneur. As a result, Kiva provides a platform in which interpersonal connections between lenders and borrowers can take place. The Kiva model is a more intimate way to lend.
In his article, "Kiva vs. MicroPlace: What's the Difference?", Robert Katz suggests that in some ways the two organizations compete, since on one hand they "compete for lenders". On the surface, this does appear to be the case, and I am sure there will be some crossover of lenders who support MicroPlace over Kiva, or vice versa. However, it seems that the two organizations will also attract different groups of lenders as well. For example, people who prioritize the interpersonal connection they can make with entrepreneur borrowers will be drawn to Kiva. In contrast, people who want to help alleviate poverty by empowering entrepreneurs while at the same time earning interest (however small) will gravitate to MicroPlace.

The question of competition between these two organizations, Kiva and MicroPlace, seems to me to be a non-issue. Sure, there may be competition. One organization may attract more lenders than another. However, for entrepreneur borrowers and the microfinance community at large, the launch of MicroPlace is a win. Afterall, it is the alleviation of poverty that is the important goal.

The launch of MicroPlace is a great thing for the microfinance world. With its strong corporate backing from Ebay, MicroPlace will provide that much more exposure and awareness of microfinance to an even broader audience. It was so great to join in tonight's launch celebration of MicroPlace. It's an exciting, promising new project that is sure to benefit hard-working poor people around the world.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Streetside Stories in San Francisco


Tonight I went to a "Tell It Like It Is" introductory presentation given by the wonderful staff at Streetside Stories in San Francisco, California.

Wow, this team has it together! Their presentation was engaging, very well-organized, and informative. I had the sense that the six storytelling programs they run must be equally excellent.

So, what did I learn? Some interesting statistics, for starters. For example, in the city of Oakland, California, just across the bay from the city of San Francisco - a span of just a few miles, Streetside reports that the high school graduation rate is about 50%. I was shocked. The most affluent country in the world, in one of the most advanced and affluent regions in this affluent country, and the graduation rate is only 50%? Wow.

"What is the major reason why students drop out of school?", the director of Streetside asked those of us in attendance. I tossed out the guess that maybe it is because kids come from broken families. Others in tonight's audience suggested that maybe kids drop out as a result of drugs or violence in their community. Well, according to Streetside, studies show that the main reason kids stop going to school is because they are not engaged, they do not connect at school.

When I think about the times as a child that I did not want to go to school, I can understand how not feeling connected could lead to a child opting out of school. In my case, on the few occasions that I did not want to go to school, my parents made me go, so I went.

How ironic though, to think that while some kids here in the United States are given the gift of education and choose not to accept it, other kids in developing countries dream of the opportunity to attend school and go through much hardship to make education a reality. Why is this?

Another interesting thing I learned tonight is that although many studies reveal the importance of an arts education, one of the unintended consequences of the "No Child Left Behind (NCLB)" law has been a slow stripping of art, or anything else that "smacks of extracurricular", from the school day. This is ironic, since statistics on arts education demonstrate that the arts can help to solve many aspects of the underachievement that NCLB seeks to address.

For example, young people who participate in the arts for at least three hours on three days each week through at least one full year are:
  • 4 times more likely to be recognized for academic achievement
  • 3 times more likely to be elected to class office within their schools
  • 4 times more likely to participate in a math and science fair
  • 3 times more likely to win an award for school attendance
  • 4 times more likely to win an award for writing an essay or poem
  • 4 times more likely to perform community service compared to their peers
In addition, from a vocational preparation standpoint, studies show that an arts education:
  • builds a school climate of high expectation, discipline, and academic rigor that attracts businesses relocating to the community.
  • strengthens problem-solving and critical thinking skills
  • helps students develop a sense of craftsmanship, quality task performance, and goal-setting—skills needed to succeed in business.
  • can help troubled youth, providing an alternative to destructive behavior
  • provides another opportunity for parental, community, and business involvement with schools.
  • helps all students develop more appreciation and understanding of the world around them.
  • helps students develop a positive work ethic and pride in a job well done.
    (Business Circle for Arts Education in Oklahoma, "Arts at the Core of Learning 1999 Initiative")
Thankfully, local arts organizations such as Streetside Stories are providing arts education to youth in our community schools. Through the power of storytelling, Streetside Stories provides an outlet for young people's voices to be heard. Their programs foster educational equity, provide an avenue for self-expression, and build community, literacy, and art skills. And it is these critical thinking, literacy, writing, and technology skills that can be leveraged as marketable job skills when students in the program graduate and search for employment or launch their own endeavors in the business world.

What a great program!

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

M.E.E.T. - Middle East Education through Technology

One of the most inspiring examples in the Middle East that demonstrates how technology is making a difference in the education and lives of young people is M.E.E.T. (Middle East Education through Technology).

This project, developed by alumni of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), aims to create bridges between Israeli and Palestinian youth, and break the long-held misconceptions that they have of each other. MEET project founders deliberately chose technology, an apolitical field of study, to bring youth together to meet one another, discover their cultures, their similarities, their differences — their humanity.

MEET team founders report that only a few miles separate most Israelis and Palestinians, yet their views of each other are largely based on propaganda, politics, and tragedy — rarely through personal interaction. Through its innovative educational environment, MEET facilitates the common ground for Israeli and Palestinian high school students, providing opportunities for them to learn to look at one another not only as fellow individuals, but even as potential partners.

The team of MIT alums who founded MEET recognized that in business around the world professionals work together every day to advance goals within culturally and politically diverse environments. In the business world, identity revolves around professional interests rather than political ideologies. MEET aims to create a similar environment for Middle Eastern youth, where stereotypes gradually begin to take a back seat to cooperation and relationship building.

To attract youth to its program, MEET provides training in tangible skills that will assist youth in their future: computer science, leadership and entrepreneurship. In addition to these tech skills, one of the most powerful outcomes of the MEET program is that youth are also equipped with the tools to make a difference in their communities and beyond, together.

Technology is slowly breaking down walls between people and cultures, politics, and religions. MEET provides a powerful example. By creating a positive environment in which youth can learn about something they enjoy and collaborate on projects together, relationships and trust are fostered. Youth in the MEET program report that they have come to realize that the things we have in common are much greater than the things that separate us. Despite differences in religion and politics, youth learn that we share in our humanity, our capacity for joy and suffering, and in our desire to create a vibrant future for ourselves, our families, and our communities. And this, is why I believe the MEET model is brilliant.

The success of MEET inspires me to think about how this model can be replicated elsewhere in the world. What would it take? Which partners in the community could contribute? And how could this model be modified to best fit local circumstances and resources?

Monday, November 12, 2007

Give One, Get One Laptop. And Get a Tax Deduction. And Get Free T-Mobile Hotspot Access. Wow!


The idea of a gift that keeps on giving comes to mind when I think about the "Give One Get One" program from One Laptop Per Child which begins today, November 12th.

This program provides an opportunity for people in the United States and Canada to buy one "XO laptop" for the child in their life, and also donate a laptop to a child in a developing nation, all for $400.

The mission of One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) is to empower the children of developing countries to learn by providing one connected laptop to every school-age child. In order to accomplish their goal, they need people who believe in what they are doing and who want to help make education for the world’s children a priority, not a privilege. The "Give One Get One" program is one way to help OLPC reach their goal of sending more laptops to children in developing countries. This program, which runs for two weeks, starts on November 12th and ends on November 26th, 2007.

The icing on the cake is that as you help children in developing countries stay connected, educated, and enlightened - T-Mobile wants to support you by keeping you connected to those who matter most to you.

That's right - OLPC has partnered with T-Mobile on this fantastic program as well. So, you get a laptop, give a laptop to a child in a developing country, receive a tax-deduction for your "donation" ... and you also get one year of complimentary T-Mobile HotSpot access.

T-Mobile HotSpot broadband Internet service is available at more than 8,500 locations throughout the United States. Your complimentary year of service is valued at more than $350, and you can use any Wi-Fi-enabled device, such as your laptop computer or a Wi-Fi-enabled mobile phone, to stay connected the way you prefer.

Fantastic!

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Invisible Refugees: Colombia


"Internally displaced people in Colombia are subjects of one of, if not the worst humanitarian crisis in the western hemisphere,” and yet they remain “invisible, not only internationally, but even in Bogotá.”
- Kamel Morjane, Assistant United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2004

I just learned this past weekend about an amazing organization in Colombia that is working to empower the country's internally displaced people. Fusion Colombia, founded in 2004 by Matthew Alexander, works to alleviate poverty, protect human rights, and promote self-sufficiency among internal refugee communities. Fusion's projects center around education and outreach, job training, and small business development programs.

In the past year, Fusion Colombia reports that it "has implemented projects with partners such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the Tejaditos Foundation, and SENA (the Colombian government’s job-training agency). Fusion Colombia currently sits on the United Nations’ Humanitarian Committee of Southern Bogotá and Soacha, where it coordinates humanitarian and development activities with other organizations, local governmental agencies and the United Nations."

As noted by Kamel Morjane, Assistant UNHCR in 2004, Colombia's humanitarian crisis has gone largely unnoticed on the world's stage. As a result of the country's on-going 40 year civil war, there are now more than three million internally displaced people. Even in the capital city of Bogota, these refugee communities "remain [largely] invisible". Fusion strives to bring attention to the plight of these people and their communities.

According to Fusion, the majority of Colombia’s internally displaced persons are poor farmers who have been forced from their homes by right wing paramilitaries or leftist guerrilla groups that battle over Colombia’s resource-rich land. Displaced Colombians typically seek refuge from armed actors in the slums of urban centers, Bogotá being the most popular.

Tragically, most displaced persons living in the cities of Colombia face dire socioeconomic conditions and discrimination in employment, housing, and social services. Although 80% of displaced persons are from rural areas, once they arrive in Bogotá they intend to reside there on a permanent basis. The majority of these displaced people arrive with generally non-transferable job skills, so there is an overwhelming need for the integration services that Fusion provides.

Some alarming statistics in Colombia include:

  • 92 percent of internally displaced persons in Colombia do not make enough money to meet their basic needs and 80 percent live in situations of extreme poverty. (World Food Program, 2003)
  • For the last six years, internal displacement in Colombia has been voted one of the top ten most underreported humanitarian crises in the world by medical relief organization, Doctors without Borders.
  • In the first eight months of 2005, more than 143 youth under the age of twenty were killed by guerrillas or paramilitaries in Ciudad Bolivar, a neighborhood in Bogotá where many internally displaced persons reside.
Colombia is a beautiful, diverse country. It's tragic that there is so little media attention given to the plight of its internal refugees. I hope that soon this trend will change, and dream of the day when each of these refugees will be able to take a more active part on their own to generate awareness about their situation. Maybe through videoblogs, community portals, or their own media stations? With today's new web technologies, these are no longer such outlandish thoughts. And one day, I am certain they will have access to these tools, thereby making these dreams possible.

The good news is that organizations like Fusion Colombia exist now to serve these refugee communities and to bring more awareness about their plight. The educational and training support that Fusion provides to internally displaced communities is critical to the community's ability to help themselves out of poverty and to rebuild their lives.

To learn more about how to help Colombia's internally displaced refugees, please visit Fusion.